New Jersey is relatively well defended against the Trump administration efforts to fragment the individual and small group health insurance markets by allowing short-term plans to be sold for year-long terms and easing the path for association health plans (AHPs) to be deemed employers in their own right and so gain large group status.
New Jersey bans short-term plans outright, and tightly regulates association plans (the main species of multiple employer welfare arrangements, or MEWAs, that is, plans that cover the employees of two or more unrelated employers). In Jersey, MEWAs are regulated as small group plans,even if they're self-funded. (While self-funded plans generally are subject to federal oversight under ERISA, which preempts state law, there has long been an exception enabling states to exert all but full regulatory control over MEWAs.)
As small group plans, MEWAs in New Jersey are subject to the full suite of ACA coverage rules, including Essential Health Benefits. Small group plans are not available to self-employed individuals, or to small businesses that have no employees other than owner and spouse.. Under the Department of Labor's
proposed rule for AHPs, these self-employed individuals and small business owners would be eligible to enroll in AHPs that gain large group status.
Does the proposed rule threaten New Jersey's current regulation of AHPs? That's not clear. On the one hand, "The proposed rules also would not modify the States’
authority to regulate health insurance issuers or the insurance policies they sell to AHPs" (p. 42). At the same time, Kevin Lucia, a professor in Georgetown University's Health Policy Institute, cites concern among experts "that this is potentially going to have to be litigated. If you're an association and you set up in Oklahoma, if you read these regulations, you think, well I can sell everywhere -- and yet, California tells me I can't come in?"
Bottom line for Lucia: "It's a big question whether states will be able to maintain their authority to regulate MEWAs."
That uncertainty likely drives a provision addressing MEWAs in a bill introduced in the New Jersey legislature,
S-1877, that would establish a state individual mandate to replace the federal mandate effectively repealed by the Republican Congress.