I will be contributing to the Kevin Drum festschrift organized by Mother Jones as Kevin undergoes treatment -- thankfully, going quite well so farm and endured with grit and good humor -- for multiple myeloma. Kevin has perhaps been surprising himself with pretty active blogging through his chemo rounds, while Mother Jones staff and outsiders pitch in. Work on my contribution (finished, and running next week) along with this project has left this blog pretty fallow this week.
I note in the Mother Jones piece that I've always appreciated that Kevin's commitment to economic justice is tempered by political realism. His perceptions and assessments of Obama these past six years have also tracked pretty closely with -- and no doubt helped shape -- my own. That is, he sees Obama as "a sober, cautious, analytic, mainstream Democrat" who's substantively advanced a lot of progressive priorities while necessarily also disappointing liberal hopes on other fronts.
Where I've parted company from Kevin (and this is not the focus of next week's piece) is in reaction to Obama's rhetoric. He sees Obama's 2008 speeches and catch-phrases as "nothing more than typical campaign windiness." I see his rhetoric as an expression of the pragmatism Drum admires, articulating a nuanced, incremental sense of how progressive change occurs. That argument played out here and here.
Kevin is now recovering from a stem cell transfer, which I imagine is a pretty monumental physical challenge. So here is wishing the best, and trusting that his colleagues inside and outside Mother Jones will give him good stuff to read while recovering and catnap-blogging.
Oh, and here is one more encounter with Kevin that I enjoyed back in early 2012:
Windows of the faraway soul
Taking a busman's holiday from politics, reacting to a rapturous description of FDR Labor Secretary Frances Perkins' eyes, Kevin Drum turns his lonely eyes to us:
For a moment it seems remarkable that humans communicate with each other at all, that we do share thoughts and feelings and break through that remoteness, and do it as naturally as kittens in the same litter. And it seems equally strange that we know no other kinds of intelligent life but that of those who share our DNA and anatomy -- that there are no angels or machines to encounter in the realm of language or thought.
I note in the Mother Jones piece that I've always appreciated that Kevin's commitment to economic justice is tempered by political realism. His perceptions and assessments of Obama these past six years have also tracked pretty closely with -- and no doubt helped shape -- my own. That is, he sees Obama as "a sober, cautious, analytic, mainstream Democrat" who's substantively advanced a lot of progressive priorities while necessarily also disappointing liberal hopes on other fronts.
Where I've parted company from Kevin (and this is not the focus of next week's piece) is in reaction to Obama's rhetoric. He sees Obama's 2008 speeches and catch-phrases as "nothing more than typical campaign windiness." I see his rhetoric as an expression of the pragmatism Drum admires, articulating a nuanced, incremental sense of how progressive change occurs. That argument played out here and here.
Kevin is now recovering from a stem cell transfer, which I imagine is a pretty monumental physical challenge. So here is wishing the best, and trusting that his colleagues inside and outside Mother Jones will give him good stuff to read while recovering and catnap-blogging.
Oh, and here is one more encounter with Kevin that I enjoyed back in early 2012:
Windows of the faraway soul
Taking a busman's holiday from politics, reacting to a rapturous description of FDR Labor Secretary Frances Perkins' eyes, Kevin Drum turns his lonely eyes to us:
I'm pretty much oblivious to people's eyes. I could sit across from you for an hour in deep conversation and come away not even knowing the color of your eyes, let alone whether they scintillate or cloud over from time to time. So I am, sort of literally, a blind man when it comes to stuff like this. So I turn to you, my faithful readers. Are descriptions like this for real? It's part of the whole "eyes are the window to the soul" schtick, which has always seemed more poetic than verifiably factual to me, but what do I know?I won't say that this query triggered a new thought, but it brought to the surface one of those vague perceptions that can resurface repetitively on cue for years and decades. It comes sometimes as I pass my own eyes over the many solitary self-contained bipeds one passes every minute walking down a block in Manhattan. It's the opposite of sensing 'windows on the soul' -- rather a sense of how remote each consciousness is -- each of us a broadly similar organic machine, carrying millions-of-years-old DNA, aware of only the tiniest fraction of its own mental activity, having no idea how it got here, shaped by a mind-bogglingly complex matrix of biological and social destiny, and peering out of those elliptical windows with a consciousness as disconnected from mine as a cheetah's.
For a moment it seems remarkable that humans communicate with each other at all, that we do share thoughts and feelings and break through that remoteness, and do it as naturally as kittens in the same litter. And it seems equally strange that we know no other kinds of intelligent life but that of those who share our DNA and anatomy -- that there are no angels or machines to encounter in the realm of language or thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment